The Silenced Dialogue. (The Code)
Lisa Delpit's article, The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children, argues that "the different perspectives on the debate over "skills" versus "process: approaches can lead to an understanding of the silence dialogue. The silence dialogue is a term that Delpit uses to describe how some non-white educators feel as though they have been silenced from the dialogue on how to educate children of color. It took me a second read to really understand where the author was coming from. Some of her ideas, at first glance, seemed strange and to be quite frank a little divisive. It was when I read the text the second time and tried to look at it through an educator's lens that I really understood what the author is invoking.
Delpitt coins a term that I knew existed but did not know had a name, the "culture code". The culture code she speaks of relate "to linguistic forms of communicative strategies, and presentation of self that is, ways of talking, ways of writing, ways of dressing and interacting". An example of the dominant culture code can be how African American students who use hip hop language in daily interactions with each other, can be looked at as unintelligent if the same type of cultural language is used in a professional setting. An African American student has to learn how to speak the language code of the pervasive white culture, and a white student will never have to learn how to speak the language that African Americans use in order to navigate the world. The culture code is yet another barrier that children of color have to navigate in order to even the playing field.
When it relates to the linguistic culture code, Lisa Delpit argues that a barrier of communication exists between the way that students of color are being taught that is inherently different from the way that they are being communicated with at home. She argues that in education the way that the "liberal educators" try to educate children of color can be flawed and does a disservice. Delpit argues that middle class white families want their children to be an "autonomous student" or a student that can think for themselves without outside influences. These middle class students have already internalized the inherent culture codes of the culture of power. While parents of color want more they want their students to be also be able to navigate the "white man's world" as the mother in the article is quoted. Why would two different cultures want different things when it comes to educating their children? The answer lies in the culture code. The mother of the student, perhaps understand that there is a different cultural approach that her child must speak fluently. There are many different dialects inside of one language.
In the words of Martha Demientieff,
We listen to the way people talk not to judge them, but to tell what part of the river they come from. These other people are not like that. They think everybody needs to talk like them. Unlike us they have a hard time hearing what people say if they don't talk exactly like them. Their way of talking and writing is called formal English
At first glance, quotes and statements like the one above were a little difficult to conceptualize. I felt icky agreeing with some of the explicitly race labeled quotes in the article. It almost felt as if the author was blaming white middle class educators for not catering to the needs of students of color in the classroom. It could be, that maybe I just am not quite ready to talk about race, using the terms to differentiate a group of people. Once I read the second time the words really started to sink in, and I thought about the Johnson reading from the week before. His words echoed (and I'm paraphrasing) without giving things names how can we talk about it. The truth is, quotes like the one by Martha Demientieff, explicitly describe what it is like to educate students of a different linguistic code of English. The culture of power decides what dialect to use and makes it formal English. Student whose families do not speak the language code of formal English at home are at a disadvantage. I though a great deal about Brown vs Board of Education and the first years of desegregation in schools. Little Ruby Bridge's all over the country now found themselves in classrooms that did not use techniques that fit towards their linguistic code, and it feels that we have gotten a lot better at creating a much more inclusive classroom, but have we done enough?
PS. Below is a really cool cartoon I found on privilege. Completely unrelated to my blog post and this weeks reading but I felt it was cool and I wanted to put it in my blog for later use.





